Situation: Chemtrails

There is a major situation happening all over our skies that no one can seem to explain: white trails that spread and transform a perfectly clear blue sky into an opaque white haze. Like most people I had never really paid much attention to the phenomenon of a contrail much less the phenomenon of a contrail versus a chemtrail. A friend pointed them out to me a few years ago explaining the difference: a contrail is essentially just a vapor trail left by a jet that disappears within a few minutes. A chemtrail, on the other hand, initially looks like a contrail but lasts for hours and rather than disappear it spreads out and creates a white haze. Additionally, the jets that create chemtrails fly at extremely high altitudes and are virtually impossible to identify. Chemtrails also typically appear in a sort of grid or crisscross pattern.

But before you write me off as a crazy paranoid nutjob lets look at the background and evidence for weather modification and cloud seeding and see if a valid case can be made for this situation.

A number of patents are out there that provide the technology to synthetically manufacture chem-clouds to effectively

block the sun. One patent obtained by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) US3813875 uses barium to create ion clouds in the upper atmosphere. In 1991, Hughes Aircraft (they are right here in SD, home of Ok! Here is the Situation) obtained patent US5003186, to seed greenhouse gas layers with tiny particles which include “oxides of metal , e.g., aluminum oxide.”

That’s right…combating global warming with aluminum oxide. Sounds great right?…..except the part where we are getting doused by aluminum oxide. Do these engineers get that it eventually comes down from the sky?

Many countries like China and Russia readily admit to spraying chemicals in the sky to make it rain. Read this story in USA Today “China has the largest rainmaking (operation) in the world,” ahead of Russia and Israel, says professor Wang Guanghe, a 20-year rainmaking veteran at China’s Meteorological Sciences Academy,“weather manipulation is an enthusiastic past-time for Beijing, possibly because so many of the country’s Communist leaders are engineers. …The forecast calls for more rain. China’s five-year plan urges an increase in man-made precipitation.”

China began cloud-busting in 1958. Now “it is increasing every year,” says Wang, who cites the drought plaguing northern China as the main reason to fire rain-inducing shells or soar into the skies in cloud-seeding airplanes.”

This is why it is interesting to me that the idea of chemtrails in the US would even fall under the category of “conspiracy”.

The technology has existed for quite some time and has been used and is being used in other countries. In a communist country open weather modification is easy but here in our pseudo-democracy this sort of proposal would face enormous public outcry from anyone exposed to the chemicals. To me it just seems like par for the course. All the big corporations know if you want to get something done you have to circumvent public knowledge.

Even the Obama administration announced in April of 2009 that they were open to the possibility of “geo-engineering” the earth’s climate to counter global warming by “shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays.” So it sounds like the government is at least open to opening this pandora’s box of weather modification using some questionable chemicals.

When people concerned about chemtrails had the particulate matter tested in this Lousiana news story they found that it contained large amounts of barium and aluminum and was making people sick. There are several local news stations across the country that have covered the story and have tested the contents. And local news is typically the last media to propagate any kind of conspiracy.

Alot is unclear about this situation, but what is clear is that these lines are man-made and they contain something and we deserve to know exactly what it is. If it’s legit then tell us. Explain it to us. Because as of yet, not a single scientist has come forward to explain to us what this situation is.